GeForce Now Supported Controller List

GeForce Now is a very cool way to experience gaming on your Android TV, tablet or PC. You can get started with the free account, which allows you to queue for available servers and play up to 1h per session.

The main issue I have experienced on GFN is the limited support and documentation on what controllers are supported by the app. The official page mentions some Android type controllers but the list is very limited.

We will address other options throughout the article. If you have other controllers that run well, please comment so I can expand the list.

The DDR Memory Apocalypse

RAM price trends. Ignore the sudden drop.

I have not written anything about the memory apocalypse but what happened today is quite interesting.

The above screenshot is from an online sale of DDR4 2400MHz kits produced two months ago.

I just checked and G.Skill seems to have these and 3000MHz RAM with plenty of supply. That is certainly also new stock.

Prices start at around 54€ per 8GB DIMM, which is somewhat higher than the 40€ I'd expect it to be based on spot prices.

HP Omnibook 3 14" (AMD) Quick Review

The best picture I could find on HP materials

I recently quickly tested a mainstream HP Omnibook 3 14" laptop based on the terribly bad Ryzen 5 40 chip.

This is a new laptop with excellent build quality. This model in particular has an IPS screen and a very good one at that:

• Anti-glare type but slightly gloss
• No dirty-grit like surface w/ excellent definition.
• Excellent color range, seems like a full 100% sRGB panel with great calibration.
• Response time seemed ok

The market is being flooded with IPS screens that can only do orange instead of pure red and which have a really poor color range for saturated colors. They are much worse than even most TN panels in that aspect.

So seeing this kind of screen at the $500 range is quite a welcome change that people who only do office work or watch video will very much appreciate.

All this without being some kind of super saturated OLED screen that is beyond being useful and will actually be very bad experience.

The build is also very solid, with a nice keyboard and color scheme. I will say it is not the thinnest but the keyboard was much better than what the HP Flip 16 has with it's low profile keyboard that is not suited to anything else than casual use (even that is hard...).

I think this is the same base laptop as the $800 version that has a Snapdragon X chip, which has a low end board and chip put in. Keep in mind they may end up switch for a lower end screen for the cheaper models - it would still be IPS.

The bad

So, the main issue with this is that it is a $500 laptop with a $200 CPU. It is really not up to par:

• Speedometer 2.0 run at ~205.00, boost tops at 3.50GHz (should be 4.30)
• ~240 on i5 8265U
• ~250 on i3-N305

So it is slower than what you got from Intel i5 in 2018. Not good, despite being marketed as upstream performance.

So while I would highly recommend this for office work or video at $350, I certainly hope HP discontinues this CPU and instead sells it only with Zen 3 chips or even "Phoenix 2" chips like the 4 core Ryzen 210 or the 6 core Ryzen 220.

Those are much faster, still budget, Zen 4 based chips that should be what is inside this machine. That plus 16GB of RAM would make this a very good laptop, certainly a close competitor to the Macbook Neo.

Xbox on PC is a Joke

 

No, this is not trolling Xbox fans. I myself was an Xbox original enthusiast - it is still one of my favorite consoles I have.

I even had a 360, even though that already started a trend of... trend chasing the Wii that now is going into handhelds or AI. But it was still a good console with good games. What let it down was the software issues with even the last dashboard update making things much worse and adding "avatars" no one asked for.

So, today I wanted to discuss why you should try but not seriously consider Xbox on PC. It is a joke. 

It seems no one is doing their job and are just trying to make things as they go. Why? What is one of the most important questions of a PC gamer? It is "Can I run this game?".

Xbox, incredibly does not have PC requirements information. Not, I'm not kidding. In 2026, Microsoft expects you wait for a 100GB game to download before you know if it runs or not. Have a look:

It says if you can run on which consoles, cloud or what type of device. This is the online page but the Xbox app is the same. There is no information.

You cannot do better than Steam if you don't do the... minimum requirements to serve PC gamers.

Every Steam game has this information, even if some are outdated you still know your newer machine should do ok.

Instead, Microsoft is wasting time with AI chat bot slop:

Yes, AI LLM thing bot, what I need to know is minimum requirements for Xbox consoles. No, it does not understand sarcasm or has been trained on anything else than Xbox website, it seems.

So, while I would like the Xbox app to be good and it has been improving this is still missing.

Besides the main problem on this post, other features need improvement:

1. Downloads do not stop computer from suspending. Downloading a 100GB game may mean manually waking it up if you have short of a Gigabit connection (or are using WiFi).
2. Cannot move installed games between drives.
3. Need to have the main install folder on C drive.
4. Xbox pad works on login screen, does not let you unlock (Working with Xbox One gamepad or later)
5. Cannot use controllers other than Xbox compatible ones (360, One, Series).

Some of these are less critical but especially 1. and 2. are rather important given game sizes lately. They are also usually fixes that don't require a lot of work.

I'll revisit this page if things improve.

The Intellification of AMD

Through multiple rebrands, AMD is slowing becoming the Intel we used to know and hate. This post will hopefully keep you away from these products or at least caution you to pay a fair price.

The first step in this journey was given with the 5000 series, but it became much worse with 7000: it had Zen 4, Zen 3 and Zen 2 chips in the lineup. The distinguishing feature? It ended in 20, 30 or 40.

Now we have a "40" chip with Zen 2 cores. This was entirely predictable.

Going back to 7000, there were 7520U chips that were some low cost 4 core chips with small iGPUs called Mendocino. 7735U was Zen 3(+), but this one could be passable, even if I think it should have never been "Ryzen 7" or 7700 to begin with.

It is hard to understand the Mendocino chips because they are mostly available in more expensive laptops than this 5000 chips, despite lower core counts and significantly worse iGPUs (40%+ deficit). You could since last year, and still can, buy 5700U (Zen 2 6C), 5625U and 5825U laptops for less. Even the 5625U is a perfectly fine chip for office work and will be for some years.

The (not so) new chips

What AMD released last October and which is now reaching shelves is the Ryzen 5 40. Yes, a Ryzen 5 naming convention, which in Intel lingo meant great performance for a reasonable price.

What you get here is another Zen 2, a 7y old architecture, 4 core chip dressed up as high performance. This is extremely bad consumer practices that AMD should end right here and now. There is nothing 2025 about this chip.

This is ending up in $500+ laptops which should are not really worth more than $300, with barely enough 8GB of RAM.

AMD should name this for what it is. A true Ryzen 10 (or Ryzen 1 if they really want it to) and nothing more.

Easier decoding for everyone:

• Ryzen 5  30,  4C/8T 2.8GHz Zen 2, Radeon 610M  2CU
• Ryzen 5  40,  4C/8T 2.4GHz Zen 2, Radeon 610M  2CU
• Ryzen 3 110,  4C/8T 3.0GHz Zen 3, Radeon 660M  4CU (!!!)
• Ryzen 5 130, 6C/12T 2.9GHz Zen 3, Radeon 660M  6CU
• Ryzen 5 150, 6C/12T 3.3GHz Zen 3, Radeon 660M  6CU (higher TDP)
• Ryzen 7 160, 8C/16T 2.7GHz Zen 3, RAdeon 680M 12CU
• Ryzen 7 170, 8C/16T 3.2GHz Zen 3, RAdeon 680M 12CU (higher TDP)

Look at this product stack. A 4C chip from a slower architecture that will have a Ryzen 5 sticker on it. I don't even recall Intel doing something this devious. Ryzen 7 in a world of Zen 4 and Zen 5 chips is also extremely misleading for the consumer.

Zen 3 chips will land somewhere around Intel Core 5 and Zen 4 6C chips in performance, which are usually Ryzen 5 parts.

Anyhow, now you know. Stay away from these and recall to this chart if you need.

AM3 and AM4 Motherboards for Home Servers - MCE, ECC and RAS Features

ASRock AM4 Pro4 Motherboard

Update, 2026: Zen 3 chips require at least Kernel 6.12 for proper decoding and (I think) handling of MCE and ECC errors. Without it, only a single message of error is logged, no CE/UE are logged or actions taken.

A while back I have built ECC platforms based on consumer hardware and found the information on the web is not really accurate.

Specifically, while ASUS AM3 boards support ECC mode and I have been using this for some years now. I have never witnessed any error being reported during this time, but I am located near the sea level which has influence on the number of cosmic rays.

There is also Machine Check Exceptions support on these platforms but the motherboard itself is hit and miss. These are useful to track errors in CPU caches and other parts, that help prevent data corruption and make you aware of damaged hardware (mostly PSU or board VRMs).

Some TLDR for CPUs:

• AMD Phenom I/II and Athlon 64 X2 chips support error reporting through module "edac_mce_amd". This module works without ECC and reports cache or other errors related to the CPU.
• Athlon II also works.
• For AM4 Ryzen, APUs only support ECC if they are from "Pro" line.

TLDR for motherboard support:

• ASUS AM3 M4A8xx motherboards officially support ECC but you should not rely on it.
• ASUS AM4 and Ryzen support ECC through RASDaemon but only on up to date BIOS.
• Older ASUS AM4 BIOS report through kernel methods but only uncorrectable errors(UE) are logged in '/sys' nodes.
• All ASRock AM4 boards seem to support ECC mode, with corrected error reporting.
• Gigabyte AM4 B550 boards mention ECC mode support.
• Only ECC Unbuffered RAM is supported. (PC3/4-xxxxxE JEDEC specs)

On the kernel side:

• RAM ECC is supported through "amd64_edac" module. 
• CPU error reporting is handled by "edac_mce_amd".
  

Tested hardware:

• ASUS M4A87TD/USB3
• ASUS M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3
• ASUS A320M-K
• ASUS EX320M Gaming
• ASUS ROG Strix B450-F
• ASRock A520M Pro4

Testing Methods

At this point I've had the ASUS M4A board run with ECC RAM for 3+ years and saw no errors reported. This is not really expected even for good hardware!

The only way I see to rapidly test ECC is working is to set unstable timings with ECC disabled and confirm with Memtest86. Next, set it to on and verify it is reporting errors and/or fixing them.

ASUS AM3 Motherboards

ASUS M4A88T

The kernel itself only shows messages with no detail, no matter what kernel parameters are passed to 'mce' boot parameter:

[Hardware error] Machine Check Exception

From testing, these will be corrected errors but I don't know how it will handle uncorrectable errors, as those are harder to reproduce. There is some level of functionality here but it seems the kernel will not be aware of corruption of memory from uncorrectable errors.

The first problem is there is no additional information on what exactly the error is, so the OS will not know if it needs to kill some process to prevent data corruption. There should be additional lines after the [Hardware error] entry but the motherboards is not handling the error further.

Also, the '/sys' nodes for 'mc*' entries in edac module are not be populated with error counts. So you can't really track them over time without custom scripts that monitor the kernel log.

I don't consider ECC to be fully functional on these boards because of this, though some posts seemed to imply ECC was correctly supported.

These boards also don't report any kind of error related to CPU errors. I was first aware of this functionality when a damaged ASRock board started locking up but due to errors reported to the OS. On compatible boards, these show up on the kernel messages in the following format:

[Hardware error] Machine Check Excpetion logged
[Hardware error] ERROR DETAILS

These do not get recorded on MCE Log but are specifically handled by the kernel. ('edac_mce_amd' module) This is useful because uncorrected errors can then discard buffers or kill the process with corrupted data.

Because of ASUS not enabling this functionality, you may get some data corruption if the PSU or motherboard VRM are damaged. I would not rely on this hardware without regularly testing CPU stability with something like Prime95.

ASRock AM4

I have personally had good success with the A520M Pro 4 motherboard. When using a Zen 3, Ryzen based 5600 CPU, everything seems to work as expected. For instance, corrected errors (CE) are reported correctly:

[  988.187253] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged

[  988.187257] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no action required.

[  988.187266] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (19:21:2) MC17_STATUS[-|CE|MiscV|AddrV|-|-|SyndV|CECC|-|-|-]: 0x9c2040000000011b

[  988.187282] [Hardware Error]: Error Addr: 0x000000008df651c0

[  988.187287] [Hardware Error]: IPID: 0x0000009600050f00, Syndrome: 0xd29d00080a800c02

[  988.187295] [Hardware Error]: Unified Memory Controller Ext. Error Code: 0

[  988.187307] EDAC MC0: 1 CE on mc#0csrow#2channel#0 (csrow:2 channel:0 page:0x15beca offset:0x2c0 grain:64 syndrome:0x8)

[  988.187315] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, tx: GEN, mem-tx: RD

[ 1315.867282] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged

[ 1315.867287] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no action required.

[ 1315.867296] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (19:21:2) MC17_STATUS[-|CE|MiscV|AddrV|-|-|SyndV|CECC|-|-|-]: 0x9c2040000000011b

[ 1315.867311] [Hardware Error]: Error Addr: 0x00000000acee4840

[ 1315.867316] [Hardware Error]: IPID: 0x0000009600050f00, Syndrome: 0xd29d00080a800c02

[ 1315.867324] [Hardware Error]: Unified Memory Controller Ext. Error Code: 0

[ 1315.867335] EDAC MC0: 1 CE on mc#0csrow#2channel#0 (csrow:2 channel:0 page:0x199dc9 offset:0x40 grain:64 syndrome:0x8)

[ 1315.867343] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, tx: GEN, mem-tx: RD

[ 1643.548321] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged

[ 1643.548326] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no action required.

[ 1643.548335] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (19:21:2) MC17_STATUS[-|CE|MiscV|AddrV|-|-|SyndV|CECC|-|-|-]: 0x9c2040000000011b

[ 1643.548351] [Hardware Error]: Error Addr: 0x00000000e9115f80

[ 1643.548356] [Hardware Error]: IPID: 0x0000009600050f00, Syndrome: 0xd29d00080a800c02

[ 1643.548364] [Hardware Error]: Unified Memory Controller Ext. Error Code: 0

[ 1643.548376] EDAC MC0: 1 CE on mc#0csrow#2channel#0 (csrow:2 channel:0 page:0x21222b offset:0xe80 grain:64 syndrome:0x8)

[ 1643.548384] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, tx: GEN, mem-tx: RD

As you can see, both EDAC interface and MCE report the memory errors that were detected during memory scrub.

This is rather important feature that allows you to detect configuration or other RAM problems that may eventually cause uncorrectable errors (UEs).

Looking at the '/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/*e_count' nodes, will give you a summary of the number of each type of error since system boot.

The motherboard also works fine with both RASDaemon and mcelog software:

• When an hardware reboot is forced by MCE, the kernel logs the error when the system reboots. It is visible with dmesg command (dmesg | grep mce).
• It is also acessible by running mcelog on the terminal, upon which it will be consumed from the error stack.
• Further mcelog executions without runtime errors will return empty.

Overall, it is not surprising the ASRock has high quality support for ECC on AM4 - they have been using this type of consumer hardware on the ASRock Rack boards. They have been providing this type of hardware for server boards for many years, which is not so much the case with ASUS.

ASUS AM4

ASUS EX320M Gaming

On ASUS AM4 boards, older BIOS versions would work as the AM3 boards but memory error reporting was working correctly - you could read /sys and get error counts, or look at the kernel log.

On current BIOS, AMD has updated the error reporting to the modern RAS functionality of the Linux Kernel. You have to install RAS Daemon and use 'ras-mc-ctl' command to read error counts.

The corrected errors (CE) are reported in RAS but are not counted in EDAC 'mc*' nodes, only uncorrected errors. The kernel handles UEs and won't reboot the system if the process is non-critical or hits a page cache, which is discarded.

CPU related MCE/RAS may require some register tweaking, according to AMD's documentation for these CPUs. I have managed to reproduce CPU crashes by undervolting, with no errors reported in the kernel or RAS Daemon.

Other AM4 Brands

Gigabyte AM4 based on B550 and X570 chipsets are explicitely listed to support ECC mode with unbuffered DIMMs. Boards with A520 chipsets mention ECC but not explicitely "ECC Mode", which may mean it will work normally with ECC DIMMs but not offer the same advanced functionality.

All series of these boards seem to work as long as you select one of those two chipsets.

Gigabyte A520I AC I managed to also boot with ECC and there are a lot of configuration options related to ECC. Further testing is needed on this brand.

Lexar microSD 633x 128GB Review

Last time I reviewed an oldie, but today we're looking at a current Lexar microSD flash card. It is part of the '633x' branded cards:

• A1 app performance class,
• U3 UHS performance class (30MB/s),
• V30 video performance class.
• Lexar specs for 128GB model is 100MB/s read and 30MB/s writes.
• 32 and 64GB models don't list write speeds above the already rated by V30/U3 class.

Lexar is, since 2017, part of the chinese company Longsys. Current microSD cards and USB drives may have no resemblance to the ones manufactured by Micron. Flash is usually from Micron but that may not always be the case.

It is available in 32 up to 512GB sizes:

• Amazon US, ~$10: link (prices have gone up a lot in 2026)
• Amazon UK, ~£9: link

These are now generally available everywhere in the world.